| |
Review Form
| |
Please note that this version of the Review Form is for informing authors about the content of the Form. Reviewers receive an MS Word version containing specific content for each Full or Concise paper that they have been asked to review, and the web version of the Review Form cannot be used for submission of completed reviews. The web version is not confidential, but completed Review Forms are, and papers under review are also confidential, until published.
|
| |
| Manuscript filename: | Reviewer: | | Author nominated publication format: | Author nominated presentation format: | | Title: | | Date Sent: | Date Due: (3 weeks after despatch) |
A. General ratingsPlease rate this paper on each criterion by typing the letter x in an appropriate cell in each of the four rows. | Criterion | Poor | Fair | Good | Very good | | Suitability for an ASCILITE Conference | Contribution to the theme Beyond the comfort zone; importance and interest of the topic to Conference participants; potential to stimulate Conference discussion. |
|
|
|
| | Academic merit | Quality of literature review and statement of research goals. Appropriately chosen and documented methods, logical presentation and analysis of results, findings, inferences and conclusions. Significance of the work and implications for practices, policies or further research. |
|
|
|
| | Meets the definition of research in relation to creativity, originality, and increasing humanity's stock of knowledge. |
|
|
|
| | Standard of writing | Clear and logical presentation, appropriate style, freedom from errors, ease of reading, correct grammar and spelling, appropriate abstract, conformance with Conference specifications for referencing, length and format details. |
|
|
|
|
B. Recommendation on acceptancePlease type the letter x in an appropriate cell. | Accept as is (minor corrections may be made by the Proceedings editorial group) |
| | Accept with minor revisions to be made by the author(s) (specify under F. below) |
| | Accept after major revisions (specify under F. below) |
| | Reject |
|
C. Recommendation on Publication formatPlease type the letter x in an appropriate cell, if you feel that a variation from author's nomination (see above) is warranted. | Full paper |
| | Concise paper |
| | Poster |
|
D. Recommendation on Presentation formatPlease type the letter x in an appropriate cell, if you feel that a variation from author's nomination (see above) is warranted. | Traditional (25 mins, usually for full papers but may be recommended for concise papers) |
| | Short (15 mins, usually for concise papers but may be recommended for full papers) |
| | Poster |
|
E. Outstanding Paper AwardPlease type in your recommendation. | Should this paper be short listed for an Outstanding Paper Award? (Yes or No) |
| | If you answered YES, please rate this paper on a scale of 1 (low rating for an Award) to 10 (high rating for an Award). |
|
F. Notes to AuthorsPlease provide several sentences or paragraphs containing a constructive critique of the paper for the Program Committee to copy and paste into an email to the author(s), for the purposes of providing formative feedback, and for specifying minor or major revisions that are to be completed and resubmitted for Program Committee approval (F. and G. should not exceed 1 page total).
G. Notes to the Program CommitteePlease provide, if appropriate, several sentences or paragraphs containing any additional comments to the Program Committee that may assist with the selection process (F. and G. should not exceed 1 page total).
| Please cite as: ASCILITE (2005). Review Form. Balance, Fidelity, Mobility: Maintaining the Momentum? Proceedings ASCILITE 2004 Conference. Brisbane Queensland, 4-7 December, 2005. https://olt.qut.edu.au/udf/ASCILITE2005/index.cfm?fa=displayPage&rNum=1899969 |
|
|
