Activity in the production of multimedia educational materials is set to increase significantly at Hong Kong Polytechnic University (PolyU) as a result of the allocation of a grant from The University Grants Committee for developments in innovative teaching. A Working Group on Modern Educational Technologies is overseeing the use of the grant money, and is particularly interested in ensuring that project activities are properly supported (technically and pedagogically), and that they stimulate further activity.This paper will describe the strategic plan which was used for the implementation of new technologies at PolyU and will give a Diffusion Model which will be used for this implementation. It may be useful for other organisations which are considering implementing new technologies.
This paper will describe a strategic plan and will explain how concepts such as ownership, diffusion, change, and culture within organisations can lead to a model for implementation of new technologies.
Universities in Hong Kong are funded through The University Grants Committee (UGC) and it was the UGC's initiative to encourage and reward innovative approaches to teaching by providing a substantial amount of funding as well as allowing each university autonomy in determining how such moneys would be spent. PolyU's allocation was HK$3.6 million (HK$:Aus$ is about 5.8:1). The UGC has signalled a further amount of HK$150 million for similar purposes over the next triennium.
PolyU formed a Working Group on Modern Educational Technologies which had wide university representation. After these meetings, it was agreed to fund the following three items.
Innovation requires change within an organisation. Jones (1990) discusses many organisational change strategies; one of the most powerful occurs when the implementers are guided by their own self interest. Reward and ownership are strong motivators. Hansen and Perry (1993) point out the need for consistent rewarding of staff members for their involvement in the development of teaching materials. Development of materials and expertise by some members of the teaching staff, combined with help from support units and resources from The University, enables a "Diffusion Model" of university implementation.
Figure 1: The diffusion model The four support units, EDU, ITS, MRS, and Audio Visual Services (AVS) are all available to support developments educationally, technically, and for design work. Experiences gained and expertise developed, and indeed enthusiasm for IMMT is expected to diffuse throughout the general university community, especially with the availability of additional significant grants for projects. Resultant software and those involved in the original eight projects can act as models and consultants for other projects.
Underlying the whole framework is support from The University. This support comes in the form of resources (physical and monetary) and encouragement. Part of this encouragement involves regarding the production of software packages, that are judged to be of sufficient quality, as equivalent to "refereed publications" for the purpose of promotions, tenure, and other personnel matters.
The model contains the ingredients that Gilbert (1995) mentions as necessary for integration of technology; commitment by the institution and staff, coupled with support by various campus organisations.
Apart from the nearly two million dollars for the eight projects, PolyU is in the process of completing a Multimedia Learning Centre and an Authoring Centre. The Learning Centre will be a common facility open to students and staff where CAL packages can be used by students individually and classroom sessions requiring multimedia facilities can be held. It will have forty PCs with multimedia capabilities, a video projector, and it will have access to the campus local area network.
The Authoring Centre will house equipment purchased with grant money and will be the working centre for project research staff. Additional equipment will include printers, a scanner, and video digitising equipment.
Additionally, The University has demonstrated its commitment to developing a culture for ~ implementation by agreeing to recognise quality CAL packages as valid scholarly output comparable to refereed research publications.
It is hoped that this paper, apart from providing insight into new developments taking place in one Hong Kong university, may be useful to any institution planning the implementation of new technologies.
Gilbert, S. (1995). Teaching, learning, and technology. Change, 27(2), 47-48.
Green, K. and Gilbert, S. (1995). Great expectations: content, communications, productivity, and the role of information technology in higher education. Change, 27(2), 8-18.
Hansen, E. and Perry, D. (1993). Barriers to collaborative performance systems in higher education. Educational Technology, 23(11), 46-52.
HKPU (1995). The Hong Kong Polytechnic University: An introduction. Student handbook.
Jones, J. (1990). Facilitating change in institutional practice through action research. In O. Zuber-Skerrit (Ed), Action Research for Change and Development. Centre for the Advancement of Learning and Teaching, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 256-269.
Authors: Dr Jeff James, Senior Officer Educational Development Unit Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong etjjames@polyu.edu.hk Ph: (852) 2766 6290 fax: (852) 2334 1569
Dr John Jones, Director
Mr K. P. Kwan, Senior Officer Please cite as: James, J., Jones, J. and Kwan, K. P. (1996). Implementation of modern educational technologies. In C. McBeath and R. Atkinson (Eds), Proceedings of the Third International Interactive Multimedia Symposium, 187-191. Perth, Western Australia, 21-25 January. Promaco Conventions. http://www.aset.org.au/confs/iims/1996/ek/james.html |