ASCILITE 2004: Review Form

[ ASCILITE 2004 ] [ Call for papers ] [ Advice to Reviewers ]

ASCILITE 2004 Review Form

Please note that this version of the Review Form is for informing authors about the content of the Form. Reviewers receive an MS Word version containing specific content for each Full or Concise paper that they have been asked to review, and the web version of the Review Form cannot be used for submission of completed reviews. The web version is not confidential, but completed Review Forms are, and papers under review are also confidential, until published.

Confidential: ASCILITE 2004 Review Form

Reviewers, please read the Call for Papers and Advice to Reviewers on the Conference website under
http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/prog/call-for-papers.html
Please return completed Forms as email attachments (please do not change the Form's filename) to rjatkinson@bigpond.com by the Date Due specified below. Papers under review and completed Review Forms are confidential and the contents are not to be revealed to other persons.

Manuscript filename:	Reviewer:
Author nominated publication format:	Author nominated presentation format:
Title:
Date Sent:	Date Due: (3 weeks after despatch)

A. General ratings

Please rate this paper on each criterion by typing the letter x in an appropriate cell in each of the four rows.

Criterion Poor Fair Good Very good

Suitability for an ASCILITE Conference Contribution to the theme Beyond the comfort zone; importance and interest of the topic to Conference participants; potential to stimulate Conference discussion.

Academic merit Quality of literature review and statement of research goals. Appropriately chosen and documented methods, logical presentation and analysis of results, findings, inferences and conclusions. Significance of the work and implications for practices, policies or further research.

Meets the definition of research in relation to creativity, originality, and increasing humanity's stock of knowledge.

Standard of writing Clear and logical presentation, appropriate style, freedom from errors, ease of reading, correct grammar and spelling, appropriate abstract, conformance with Conference specifications for referencing, length and format details.

B. Recommendation on acceptance

Please type the letter x in an appropriate cell.

Accept as is (minor corrections may be made by the Proceedings editorial group)

Accept with minor revisions to be made by the author(s) (specify under F. below)

Accept after major revisions (specify under F. below)

Reject

C. Recommendation on Publication format

Please type the letter x in an appropriate cell, if you feel that a variation from author's nomination (see above) is warranted.

Full paper

Concise paper

Poster

D. Recommendation on Presentation format

Please type the letter x in an appropriate cell, if you feel that a variation from author's nomination (see above) is warranted.

Traditional (25 mins, usually for full papers but may be recommended for concise papers)

Short (15 mins, usually for concise papers but may be recommended for full papers)

Poster

E. Outstanding Paper Award

Please type in your recommendation.

Should this paper be short listed for an Outstanding Paper Award? (Yes or No)

If you answered YES, please rate this paper on a scale of 1 (low rating for an Award) to 10 (high rating for an Award).

F. Notes to Authors

Please provide several sentences or paragraphs containing a constructive critique of the paper for the Program Committee to copy and paste into an email to the author(s), for the purposes of providing formative feedback, and for specifying minor or major revisions that are to be completed and resubmitted for Program Committee approval (F. and G. should not exceed 1 page total).

G. Notes to the Program Committee

Please provide, if appropriate, several sentences or paragraphs containing any additional comments to the Program Committee that may assist with the selection process (F. and G. should not exceed 1 page total).

Please cite as: ASCILITE (2004). Review Form. Beyond the Comfort Zone. Proceedings ASCILITE 2004 Conference. Perth, Western Australia, 5-8 December. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/prog/asc04-review-form-web.html

© ASCILITE. We grant educational institutions and societies a non-exclusive licence to copy this form for personal use and adapt it for non-profit academic purposes provided that in any adaptation the source is acknowledged. Any other reproduction is prohibited without the express permission of ASCILITE.

[ ASCILITE 2004 ] [ Call for papers ] [ Advice to Reviewers ]
This URL: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/prog/asc04-review-form-web.html
HTML created 5 June 2004. Last revision: 5 June 2004.

Criterion		Poor	Fair	Good	Very good
Suitability for an ASCILITE Conference	Contribution to the theme Beyond the comfort zone; importance and interest of the topic to Conference participants; potential to stimulate Conference discussion.
Academic merit	Quality of literature review and statement of research goals. Appropriately chosen and documented methods, logical presentation and analysis of results, findings, inferences and conclusions. Significance of the work and implications for practices, policies or further research.
Academic merit	Meets the definition of research in relation to creativity, originality, and increasing humanity's stock of knowledge.
Standard of writing	Clear and logical presentation, appropriate style, freedom from errors, ease of reading, correct grammar and spelling, appropriate abstract, conformance with Conference specifications for referencing, length and format details.

Accept as is (minor corrections may be made by the Proceedings editorial group)
Accept with minor revisions to be made by the author(s) (specify under F. below)
Accept after major revisions (specify under F. below)
Reject

Traditional (25 mins, usually for full papers but may be recommended for concise papers)
Short (15 mins, usually for concise papers but may be recommended for full papers)
Poster

Should this paper be short listed for an Outstanding Paper Award? (Yes or No)
If you answered YES, please rate this paper on a scale of 1 (low rating for an Award) to 10 (high rating for an Award).