This issue marks the re-development and re-design of E-JIST. We trust 
          you will enjoy sharing and contributing to the new issues.
         We have extended the editorial team with the appointment of an Executive 
          Editor. Our Founding Editors continue with us, whilst now operating 
          from professorial appointments in other universities. 
        The design team has extended the interactive opportunities within the 
          Journal, so that not only is conceptual interaction invited as usual 
          but it is actively encouraged with the provision of Web facilities. 
          The printed, published, and issued journal has given way to the dynamic, 
          evolving and collaborative journal. Quite clearly, no one henceforth 
          has the 'last word' on any subject, unless perchance it is the data 
          archivist, who withdraws any issue into data archives; but even here 
          it will be retrievable, electronically, in a way that avoids the past 
          perils of storage of print materials and print proofs. 
        We invite presentations (that is, inputs potentially much wider than 
          just 'manuscripts') that explore the full dimensions of what is now 
          available electronically and the use of those dimensions in the promotion 
          of the science of instruction. What new instructional opportunities 
          are available now? What steps have we taken to test their efficacy? 
          What do we know of their efficiency? What changes have been introduced 
          into the dynamics of the instructional community? These are some of 
          the questions to which you might like to provide your answers for the 
          benefit of other readers. 
        For their part, readers may choose to respond to contributors' experiences, 
          by using the interactive windows in the Journal to express and share 
          their views. The Journal will provide a moderator for this activity. 
          That person's role will be to generally moderate, edit, control, guide, 
          and sum up the debate on any particular topic. This group interaction 
          should not in any way stifle private interaction between participants, 
          if you choose to engage in such activity. 
        This issue offers a range of inputs. There are formal theoretical papers. 
          There are current practice papers. There is a commentary on another 
          writer's work. There is a conference appraisal. There is a 'melting 
          pot' section where unrefined ideas are brought forward to be mulled 
          over, extended or contracted, defined and refined, etc. There is a resources 
          and links section, where readers can record discoveries of resources 
          to which they seek to draw the attention of others. 
        We hope you will be engaged enthusiastically as a reader and will want 
          to make your own unique contribution to the substance of the Journal. 
          In this issue, the Theory-based papers focus on the rapid maturation 
          and evolution of 'Fifth Generation' distance education beyond distance 
          education itself (Jim Taylor); on the theoretical and practical dialogue 
          dimensions of interactive Web-based instruction (Ann Shortridge) (as 
          illustrated in a course on poultry physiology); and to an argument for 
          the use of the Problem-based approach to Web-based Corporate Learning 
          (Cher Ping, Lim; Seng Chee, Tan; and Jeffrey Klimas). (With this latter 
          paper you may choose to examine the nexus between the problem-based 
          approach and the support structure and then move to another issue, namely, 
          to question the influence cultural learning styles plays in the adoption 
          of instructional strategies.)
         The Practical papers describe how the introduction of the African 
          Digital Library was proposed, initiated, and implemented to service, 
          cheaply and expeditiously, 54 African nations with resources from the 
          world (Paul West); and how five steps were followed in the provision 
          of an online Histology course (Sherry McConnell and Regina Schoenfeld-Tacher). 
          (This latter paper has a very interesting side observation. Unknown 
          to the lecturer one of her students was a member of both her online 
          course and a different campus-based course. The lecturer notes she developed 
          a close relationship online, while the relationship in the anonymous 
          lecture theatre simply did not develop, since it was not till the end 
          of semester that the student identified herself.)
         The Conference Commentary is from an experienced participant (Jannette 
          Kirkwood), one of the 1305 delegates from 88 countries, at the International 
          Council for Distance Education conference in Dusseldorf in April, 2001. 
          Inevitably 'digital divide' issues emerged as delegates debated what 
          esoteric innovation contributed to the provision of basic learning opportunity. 
          Other delegates may offer different perspectives. 
        For the Commentary section Madeleine McPherson chose Stephen Schatz's 
          attention-grabbing paper, 'Paradigm Shifts and Challenges for Instructional 
          Designers: An introduction to Meta Tags and Knowledge Bits'. It is a 
          useful paper and she brings a critical appraisal to it. The debate is 
          now thrown open to further comment from all parties. 
        For Melting Pot, we're not sure what will arrive there before the release 
          of the issue. That's part of its mystique. Likewise, Resources and Links 
          will be open-ended and an accumulating depository. The accumulation 
          begins with this issue. You may not even be reading the end of this 
          editorial, because you have already moved off to pursue some topic of 
          immediate interest to you in the issue. That's fine … and appropriate.
         You make this Journal serve your purposes. Nevertheless, if engaging 
          with the Journal stimulates you to further your research and/or develop 
          new practice, we would be interested in receiving some account of your 
          experiences, to share with other readers in future issues 
        Ian Mitchell
          Executive Editor